Kanpur Wealth Management:Original United States and India’s bright fighting

Original United States and India's bright fighting

In fact, behind this is two things that occurred in the second half of 2023.

The first thing is the G20 summit held in New Delhi, India from September 9th to 10th, 2023.

Regarding this summit, Modi is not attentive. Not only will we hold more than 200 meetings related to G20 in the country, but also a budget of tens of billions of rupees.Get away.

Those who can’t get away are blocked with things to prevent foreign guests from seeing it.

The United States is also looking forward to this summit, because the G20 summit held in Indonesia in 2022, joint statement in the joint statement, conducting criticism of Russia, was regarded by the West as a major victory.

So at the New Delhi G20 Summit in 2023, he naturally continued to make persistent efforts to turn the criticism of non -name into "criticism criticism". When Modi visited the United States three months ago, the United States gave so much to today.

As long as the name criticism is named in the joint statement, India has attacked the name.

In order to let Modi agree, the United States gave two sweet dates. One was to issue the "India -US Joint Statement" again. The content was similar to the one in 3 months ago.Said to you must give you.

The second is to launch the "Indo -Europe Economic Corridor" project.

The "Indo -Europe Economic Corridor" is from Mumbai, to the UAE and Saudi Arabia, and to a commercial road in southern Greece.

Indian goods are sold to Europe, either go to the Red Sea or go to the corner. If this project can be achieved, it can be directly connected to Europe and it is very helpful to the Indian economy.

Give so much, Should India always give some rewards?

However, the fact is that Modi’s performance has disappointed the United States.He never agreed to criticize Russia. In a joint statement issued afterwards, let alone criticize criticism, not even criticism.

The severe degree of wording is obviously not as good as the G20 joint statement in 2022. After the statement was issued, Russia was relieved.

But Biden was unhappy. It was useless to spend so much money, so the last meeting of the G20 did not participate, and went directly to Vietnam.

The second thing was that in December 2023, Indian Foreign Minister Su Jiesheng visited Russia, and Putin, Rafrov, and Minister of Industry and Trade Mantrov met with Su Jiesheng.

In the entire 2023 before Su Jesheng visited Russia, except for Raftrov’s visit to India for attending the G20, India -Russia did not have any other high -level interviews.

The arrival of Su Jiesheng showed that India tried to re -consolidate Indian -Russian relations after seeing the hope of the Ukrainian army. There was a "starting the International North -South Transport Corridor" in the cooperation content of the two sides.Kanpur Wealth Management

The "International North and South Transport Corridor" departed from Mumbai in western India, entered Iran through the sea, then entered Caucasus to Russia, and then entered Europe, which aims to strengthen the connection between India and Russia and Europe.

A bit of the Indian version of the "Belt and Road".

When you look at the map, you will find that the "International North and South Transportation Corridor" has a must -have place -Iran’s Port of Chabahar.

Without Iran’s support, the line must fail, which determines that India must have a good relationship with Iran.

On May 13 this year, Iran and India signed a 10 -year Kubahar port cooperation agreement. India will invest 370 million US dollars to Port to promote the landing of the "International North and South Transport Corridor".

You know, the Modi government’s position in a new round of Palestinian -Israeli conflict is Israeli. The "Indo -Europe Economic Corridor" plan can theoretically strengthen the interests of India and Israel.

But here is to strengthen contact with Iran, and to strengthen contact with Russia. What will the United States think?

You are unwilling to join the name of the name, and the benefits must be all.

Standing in the United States, you can only choose one of the two.

However, from Modi’s position, Zarproe’s counterattack failed. Russia would not lose. Is it not fragrant if I continue to fish for both ends?And to be honest, the United States is too little.

What is going on?

Although there are many words in the United States and India Joint Statement in June 2023, most of the cooperation content is either intentional or long -term.

In the short term, only Micron’s investment in India has invested $ 485 million in India, and the United States allows warships to repair in India and produce in India (actually assembled) F-414 turbofan engines.

These things are indeed real gold and silver, but don’t forget that India has a large volume and has a great appetite.With these projects just want India to vote for the name, stand on the opposite side of Russia?

Putin is my beloved relatives and friends. Brothers, you have to add money.

So, has Biden added money?

In June 2023, the "India -US Joint Statement", and the joint statement in September 2023, and the part published after the Shatin’s visit in June 2024, the content of the three was basically the same.

Compared to the first copy, there are indeed some things in the latter two, but not many.In other words, adding money, but not much.This is why in July of this year, Modi was going to visit Russia to repair the relationship between the two countries.

Since you don’t want to add money, let’s stimulate.

However, the United States is unwilling to add money, not only India insists on strategic autonomy, but also has deep concerns.

If you want to smash a lot of money on a person, you have to ensure that he is his own person, the same politics, and a lot of money on another country. You have to ensure that this country is your own camp and is controlled.

Otherwise you will feel that this money must be drifted.

To incorporate a country into your own camp, you must be controlled by your own, saying that when you wear it, you can penetrate, cultivate "agents", and support these "agents", so you can rest assured.

This is why the United States always requires countries to open up unilaterally, because it is open to easy penetration, not open, it is difficult to penetrate, and it is difficult to cultivate agents.

Only when it penetrates in and cultivates a sufficient number of agents, will it be assured of you, will open more markets and transport more resources.To some extent, this is the epitome of we and the United States for decades.

Although it knows that it has a lot of negative effects, in order to develop the economy, it is not decoupled and cannot tear the face. The only way is to limit this penetration to a certain range.

Similarly, if India wants the United States to increase money and wants the United States to open up the market, it is necessary to allow the United States to penetrate and allow the United States to cultivate agents in their own internal training.

But India is not allowed.

I am in the "Election of the Election, and Modi is facing difficultiesMumbai Stock Exchange?In the article, Modi should implement "de -Englishization" in education and implement local language teaching, which is equivalent to gradually leaving the English world, which is seriously unfavorable to the penetration of the United States.

But Modi’s measures do not stop there.There are two more policies that combat Western penetrationChennai Investment. It is rarely mentioned in China, but it is very important.

After Modi came to power in 2014, under his continuous promotion, most of the Indian state passed the "Anti -Conversion". The content of the bill was very simple. Other religious believers could convert to Hinduism, while Hindus was not allowed to convert to other religions.

The outside world’s views on "Anti -Conversion" often believe that it is to crack down on Muslims.

For example, in May 2023, a conflict of ethnic conflict occurred in Manptar, which was the Meitai people who believed in Hinduism, and cleaned the Curvi people who believed in Christ. The incident killed hundreds of people and tens of thousands of people fled their homes.

For a long time, the Indian People’s Party’s strategy in Manptor is to attract Meitai with the majority of the population and crack down on the minority Kuki and Natal.

So after the conflict, Modi only said a few words of salty and indifferent words. In fact, it was encouraging the Meitai people. You are more powerful.

And Christianity has always been the pioneer that the West, especially the United States, has penetrated around the world. It wants to be an American agent, wants to get the trust and support of the United States, and is baptized.

The most typical is Lao Jiang.

Lao Jiang married Song Meiling in the past. In addition to being rich in the Song family, the Song family was the American agent, and the Song family was a Christian or the gold master of the Christian Church at the time.The hard condition is to abandon the Buddha and believe in Jesus.

Old Jiang chose to agree after weighing the advantages and disadvantages.

Not only Lao Jiang, many of the United States agents in China today are Christians. It is not accidental, and Modi’s policy of cracking down on Christianity is seriously not conducive to the penetration of the United States.

In the past ten years, under Modi’s heavy punch, Christianity has been obvious in India. Taking Congress as an example, there were usually one or two Christian lawmakers in the Indian parliament, and today’s Indian parliament has no Christian lawmakers.

In addition to Christianity, another key point of Modi is NGO.

We know that it is the norm to penetrate the NGO in the West, as well as India. There are about 25,000 NGOs in India to accept Western donations. Modi has long seen them unhappy.

Soon after taking office, Modi pulled the infamous NGO "Ford Foundation" into the blacklist. The "Ford Foundation" was very familiar with the NGO with close contact with CIA.

There are often where there is Yan leather, where there is a "Ford Foundation". For example, in July this year, a large -scale riots occurred in Kenya, asking President Rato to step down, and Luto directly named the "Ford Foundation" inciting riots.

Such an important white glove was black, and the United States was definitely dissatisfied, but this was just an appetizer. After the epidemic, Modi brought the main course.

In January 2020, the Indian government revised the "Foreign Donation Registration Law" (referred to as: FCRA). The revised content is as follows:

(1) NGO, which accepts overseas funding, must be registered before it can be operated;

(2) It must be opened in a bank designated by the Indian government for government supervision;

(3) One NGO’s money and materials cannot be given to another NGO, you can only use it by yourself;

(4) Administrative expenditures shall not be greater than 20%of total expenditure.

Article 1 and 4 actually have a small impact. The key is two or three. It just requires the lives of the Western NGO. If the flowing water lets the Indian government know, how can they do it?

In 2022, more than 6,000 NGOs failed to meet the standards and were immediately terminated by the Indian government. It is interesting that many of these NGOs who have been terminated are connected with Christianity.

For example, the Indian branch of "Le Shi" still has 65 million on the account. He was frozen by the Indian government and could not be taken out.

In education, "going to English" and cracking down on Christians should also strictly restrict the penetration of Western NGOs, indicating that the Indian government under the leadership of Modi is unwilling to open up ideology to the United States and not accept infiltration.

In this way, it is difficult for the United States to cultivate sufficient interest agents inside India and cannot include India in control. Then it can only give a small amount of money, and big money will not be given.

Because in this case, even if a lot of money is given, the probability is to drift water.

If you understand the king back, will Indo -American relations change?Udabur Wealth Management

Knowing the king does not care about ideology, nor does it care about the relationship between India and Russia, which is an active factor for Indian -American relations.

But there are two points that cannot be avoided. One is that understanding the king will return industries, and India hopes to get industrial transfer, and the interests are clearly conflicted;

The second is that the "International North and South Transport Corridor" will not stop, and the strengthening of relations between India and Iran will inevitably cause dissatisfaction in the United States.

The international game is very complicated. Many times, there are no absolute people who are. Even the American allies, the contradiction between the United States is a basket, let alone India.

The opponent is never a iron plate, and some are contradictions that can be used.At the same time, this complex existence of India has great inspiration to the world.

To put it bluntly, India provides a case: When the United States really gives you a good job, if you really give you a good benefit, you better not to do this, and even increase your efforts to do what he does not want to see.

Now there is a trend that is global right -wing and global nationalism. This is not necessarily a good thing, but it may not be a bad thing.Nationalism is a double -edged sword. In global games, everyone is increasingly considered their own interests.

In this case, no matter whether this strength is or not, the self -awareness of many countries will be unprecedentedly high, and India is typical.This kind of country will not obey anyone easily, even in the United States.

This practice that emphasizes its own interests will bring us a lot of operating space. As long as we have a proper card, the so -called "Indo -Pacific Strategy" is not so easy to succeed.

Jaipur Stock

Latest Posts